Case Studies

Last updated on 2026-08-05 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 45 minutes

Overview

Questions

  • “How are different teams and organisations actually converting and serving data in practice?”
  • “What problems do they face, and which solutions have worked well (or badly)?”
  • “What lessons can we take from their architectures and workflows for our own projects?”

Objectives

  • “Hear real-world experiences from practitioners applying cloud‑native data workflows.”
  • “Understand how different organisations approach data conversion, cataloguing, versioning, and visualisation.”
  • “Reflect on how these examples inform your own architectural and best‑practice decisions.”

Session format


In this open session, invited speakers will briefly present their experience (e.g. 10-12 minutes each):

  • Where they work and what kinds of data and applications they focus on.
  • How they are converting and organising data (NetCDF → Zarr, virtual Zarr, STAC, GeoZarr, Icechunk, etc.).
  • The main applications, users, and performance constraints they design for.
  • Key architectural decisions, trade‑offs, and implications (governance, cost, reproducibility, operations).

After each talk, there will be a short Q&A, followed by a joint discussion at the end of the session.

Key Points
  • “Real-world case studies show that cloud-native architectures differ by mission, user needs, scale, and operational constraints.”
  • “Successful teams make explicit trade-offs among performance, cost, governance, reproducibility, and maintainability.”
  • “Common building blocks include Zarr (physical or virtual), STAC for discovery, and versioning approaches for controlled updates.”
  • “Architectural decisions should be guided by concrete workloads and user access patterns, not only by tool popularity.”
  • “Cross-team sharing of implementation lessons helps avoid repeated mistakes and speeds up adoption of robust workflows.”